friends [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Ludwig

[ website | My Website ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Olympics [Aug. 19th, 2008|10:03 pm]

partywhipple
[mood | bitchy]

Ok let me make this very clear:

America is NOT winning the medal count. We do not win the count just by having the most fucking medals. If it were done like that then there would just be three medals for the three top contenders and there would be a fucking 1 level podium. Then we could play all three damn national anthems AT THE SAME TIME and it would suck. I am about as crazy about our country as one can get but the medal count thing is fucking retarded. If we were fair we'd give points for each medal and then say the country with the most points is the winner.

Gold = 3 points
Silver = 2 points
Bronze = 1 point

So here is the score so far:

China
43 gold medal = 129 points
14 silver medals = 28 points
19 bronze = 19 points
China point total = 176 points

America
26 gold medals = 78 points
26 silver medals = 52 points
27 bronze medals = 27 points
America point total = 147 points

Russia
10 gold medals = 30 points
14 silver medals = 28 points
18 bronze medals = 18 points
Russia point total = 76 points

Clearly China is first. This does NOT take into account that they are obviously lying about the age of some of their gymnastics team members. I don't fucking care. Let them cheat. It's much better to beat them WHILE they are cheating but losing to a cheater is no shame. And our athletes who, for the most part, are doing this by their own free will instead of created by their fucking government should be damned proud they can compete with, and sometimes beat, the robots the new Red Empire is churning out.

Sorry, but every time I see the damn medal count with America on top I get pissed. It's just dishonest. We're not winning. And, let's be straight, it our ATHLETES who are the real winners. We're just a bunch of fucking fanboys who have done shit to help them.

/rant
link9 comments|post comment

Gaming [Aug. 19th, 2008|07:03 pm]

voltbang
I want to start running an RPG. At gencon I played in a Torchwood game, run using the spycraft 2.0 rules that I really liked. So, that's what I'm going to base my game on, but I have to change it some. Otherwise, it becomes a torchwood and who trivia contest. So the nature of the supernatural stuff will be different. But the basic theme will be similar. An extra-governmental agency that investigates wierd stuff that regular agencies can't handle. There will be some sort of rift/hellmouth/portal and of course, a sense of escalation. The something-ocalypse is coming. This won't be cardiff, it'll be DC or atlanta or somewhere in the US. The one I played at gecon was in cadada.
Read more... )
link6 comments|post comment

Sick day [Aug. 19th, 2008|04:11 am]

lipbylipby
[Tags|]

It is 4:12am and I have been tossing and turning and coughing all night-- the cold Yoko had last week seems to have caught up with me-- but I'm feeling a weird combination of weak and disoriented and energized. This combination of symptoms must be a sign of something exotic, fatal, and uncurable.
link1 comment|post comment

Not a bad quiz. [Aug. 18th, 2008|10:30 am]

prester_scott
[Tags|, ]

Even if I'm not sure what a "Geolibertarian" is. I guess one who is a "citizen of the world" and doesn't believe in nations?

What Kind of Libertarian Are You?
Your Result: Paleolibertarian
 

Paleolibertarians differ from neolibertarians (see above) in that they are isolationists who do not believe that the United States should become entangled in international affairs. They also tend to be suspicious of international coalitions such as the United Nations, liberal immigration policies, and other potential threats to cultural stability.

Geolibertarian
 
Classical Liberal
 
Objectivist
 
Libertarian Partisan
 
Neolibertarian
 
Anarchist
 
Anarcho-Capitalist
 
What Kind of Libertarian Are You?
Make Your Own Quiz

Courtesy of [info]jordan179.
link20 comments|post comment

A Jihadist nation with nuclear weapons [Aug. 18th, 2008|12:56 am]

level_head
[Tags|, ]

As of Pervez Musharraf's resignation (an hour ago), that is Pakistan's description.

The elements within the Pakistan government that created and fed the Taliban -- the nation who voted last year to award to Usama bin Ladin the Sai'fallah, Islam's highest honor -- the group that led the world to the brink of nuclear war in December 2001 -- is now in control.

This should be interesting.

===|==============/ Level Head
link65 comments|post comment

[Aug. 17th, 2008|10:47 pm]

lisamaria
STRAWMAN JUST ADMITTED TO LIKING DIRTY DANCING!!!

(much like liking slumber party massacre II, he likes it because its "bad," but still.)
link2 comments|post comment

[Aug. 17th, 2008|10:46 pm]

voltbang
Look, it's awesome!

linkpost comment

Lightbulb Moment [Aug. 17th, 2008|10:46 pm]

lisamaria
Oh! I figured out why the dreams became real! Because her crazy sister in a mental institute spoke to her through her dreams and told her not to go all the way. It started the second that boyfriend-with-no-personality penetrated her! She was like "Matt, I've never..." and then the guy with the drill said "Gone all the way?" and killed him. Got it. Yeah.
linkpost comment

Before I retire to the 2 coreys... [Aug. 17th, 2008|10:25 pm]

lisamaria

 Man.

We just watched the most delicious and best movie out there.

  "Slumber Party Massacre 2."

  Basically, the broad from empty nest, or wings, or one of those shows that my mom watches, goes to a condo with her girl-band friends where there are  no parents. She keeps having dreams about this rock-n-roller guy who's like a cross between andrew dice clay, richard grieco, and elvis, and he has a red, ridiculous guitar with a giant drill on the arm. She dreams of him killing people, as well as plucked roaster chickens jumping out of the fridge at her, giant acne zits killing her friends, all sorts of stuff. Right as she's about to get banged, these dreams go from fake to real without really telling you why, and her lover is killed. everyone is killed, pretty much, and the killer shows up here and there spouting out semi-appropriate song title one liners. He has a solo. This movie has a lot of original music in it. I heard one song that i think was the lyrical equivalent to little red corvette (chinese convertible, i love the way you move.) and another song that was the sound-alike to stray cat strut. Oh yeah, the guy was also a little stray-cat-guy-ish.

Anyway, This was a totally awesome high-budget low-budget movie. I'm glad I watched it! Also, i was right. I knew that the first Ts we'd see would be the girl who showed her Ts first.

linkpost comment

Soooooooooo [Aug. 17th, 2008|07:34 pm]

9thmoon
[mood | contemplative]

I bought red hair dye.

Oh, yes, I did.
link21 comments|post comment

Iraq: "Our call alone?" [Aug. 17th, 2008|03:20 pm]

level_head
[Tags|, , ]

(I've seen many, mostly young, writers suggesting that Russia's attack on the country of Georgia was exactly like our attack on Iraq in 2003. One described us as having forever lost any moral high ground by asserting that the decision to invade Iraq in 2003 was "our call alone". I disagreed.)

It's worth noting that "our call alone" was the United Nations -- both in 1990 and in 2002.

The other attack on Iraq, in 1998, was done with no cooperation (nor even advance contact with) the UN. See even Wikipedia's "Operation Desert Fox". It targeted, among other things, one of Hussein's Presidential Palaces as well as command and control centers, hoping to kill Hussein and officially "to disrupt his ability to maintain his grip on power." We were helped by the British, who participated in the bombing campaign -- though they expressed surprise at the timing.

So I must disagree with the "our call alone" concept, as it seems to point in a direction opposite from what you intend.

But Iraq is rather unique. We (the US and allies under the auspices of the UN) entered into written agreement with Hussein's government in 1991 that hostilities would be suspended for so long as he cooperated in disbanding his country's WMD programs and complied with other human rights issues; this was documented in Resolution 687 (but the agreement was separate).

Hussein agreed that, were he found to have violated the cease-fire, it would end -- and he would be removed. The US and the UN spent the next twelve years trying to get him to comply; he never did.

But Hussein explicitly agreed in advance to the consequences of his failure to comply. He counted on largely toothless efforts of the UN and the squeamishness of the US, and for a dozen years this worked.

So, in light of the actual history here, it seems again to me that characterizing his final removal in 2003 pursuant to UN resolution 1441 (and a number of earlier ones) as "our call alone" is quite unfair. Hah! Resolution 1441 was unanimous, but there was one objection and two abstentions over the peace agreement! And it had better support than in the 1990 Gulf War.

Russia and China and France all voted in November 2002 for this "final opportunity" for Hussein to comply. Even Saddam Hussein himself agreed to honor it, over the objections of his own Parliament.

And no one at the UN inspection groups ever suggested in any report that Hussein was in compliance with any of those resolutions -- we caught him transporting nuclear materials across the desert just weeks after he signed the agreement, and implementing new prohibited missile programs which we discovered just weeks before going in. And there were thousands, literally, of other non-compliance issues.

How many wars do you know of where both sides had agreed on them, in writing, in advance?

===|==============/ Level Head
link15 comments|post comment

[Aug. 17th, 2008|03:36 pm]

lisamaria
Today we went to the morristown farmers market. Making posole verde again, which is delicious. Also we fixed our bed, which broke last night. I also cleaned the balls out of our toaster oven, scooped turds, and I'm cleaning and hanging some things up. I need to finish the shelves in my bedroom closet, and actually hang stuff up. I met my neighbor yesterday. She said we're not loud. Also got an episode of weeds under my belt- i am still behind 2 episodes though.
linkpost comment

On Suicide, Frailty, and Forgiveness [Aug. 17th, 2008|01:48 pm]

prester_scott
[Tags|]

C. Michael Patton on whether suicide is an unforgiveable sin, and more broadly, whether any sins left unconfessed are unforgiven.
To say that we cannot have unconfessed sin when we die is problematic both Biblically and practically. Biblically, Paul is clear that once we have faith in Christ we have been saved. This salvation is primarily from the ultimate penalty of our sin: eternal death. If we cannot truly be saved until we die with all sins confessed, then we cannot ever say that we are saved as Paul does. The best we can do is say we might be saved (i.e. if I die without any unconfessed sin). Salvation would always have to be spoken of as a contingent possibility, not a present reality. Yet Paul says to the Ephesians "By grace you have been saved" (Eph. 2:8). Christ says in John 6:24 "Whoever believes in me has eternal life." There is no contingency here. The question becomes, Do you really believe?

The practical problem is this: If you do have to die without any unconfessed sin, how are you to be spiritually aware enough to remember all your sins? What if you forget one. What about the time you sped through the school zone? What about the time you pridefully thought about your promotion at work? What about the time you envied your neighbor’s new sprinkler system? What about the time you said you were sick, to avoid something, and you really weren’t? From a practical stand point, everyone will die with unconfessed sin. Most of these will include serious sins such as greed, pride, and envy. Therefore, we are all bound for hell? This trivializes the cross, forgiveness, and sin.
Though not all Christians use this term, most Christians acknowledge the existence of "mortal sin," interpreting 1 John 5:16-17 to refer not to physical death (in which case, suicide is the mortal sin par excellence!) but spiritual death, effective apostasy. But determining whether a given sin "crosses the line" is difficult. On the one hand, it would seem that even the smallest sin can be deadly. Christ equates lustful looks with adultery and verbal insults with murder. In his parable of Lazarus, the damned rich man is not portrayed as being guilty of any dramatic wickedness, merely that he was worldly and did not have enough room in his heart for the poor. On the other hand, any number of people are driven by ignorance or perversion, with biological or psychological or social roots, that persist even after conversion, to commit all sorts of grave acts. Suicide is a great example of this, often driven by mental illness, a malady to which Christians are certainly not immune. While sins committed "under the influence" are certainly still sins -- and cause a lot of damage -- we rightly ask whether they really proceeded out of a knowing, willful rejection of God, whereby the sinner has turned his back on God and placed himself beyond the reach of saving grace. I think it depends on how deeply impaired the person is at the time. I gather Mr. Patton thinks that a person wouldn't commit suicide if he were of sound mind, but I don't agree. A man can grow so despondent, desperate, angry, spiteful, that he commits the great sin of symbolically destroying the whole universe, as described by Chesterton in Orthodoxy. He may be driven to it by unbearable physical agony, or bad brain chemistry, or a nightmarish childhood, which would make him less culpable; but he might also have moments of lucidity in which the opportunity to stand against his evil impulses is offered him, yet he refuses and pridefully embraces his dark comforts. We are rarely, if ever, in a position to discern this about the inner workings of another's mind. But God knows.

Not only is it really only God who knows how best to judge us, but it is also God who best loves and cherishes us. Let us remember to take the proper perspective whenever we have such theological disputes. He is no cold casuist who sits on the heavenly bench. Still less is he our Accuser, watching and waiting for us to screw up -- that's what Satan does, not God. No, God is a terrible Lover of and Warrior for his people. All who come to him, weary and heavy-laden, he will in no wise cast out. He is patient and very good, and he knows that we are weak creatures of dust. We are not more merciful or compassionate than the great Prodigal Father, or the Good Shepherd who goes in search of the lost sheep. I agree with Patton that if God were to demand that we must confess each and every sin specifically before we may be forgiven it, then the Cross is not much comfort and we are not in a much better position than without it, because none of us has enough knowledge to make such a complete confession. It seems to me better theology, knowing what great love God has shown us in and through Jesus Christ, to presume that those whom he has called and taken to himself and adopted as beloved children, he will do whatever is possible (which is surely more than we can imagine) to save them to the uttermost. I am not necessarily here embracing the P of TULIP; still less am I suggesting a broader apocatastasis or universalism; these are precluded, I think, by Holy Scripture. But at the same time, we overestimate the power of human freedom and human sin, and underestimate God's power and possibly his character, if we give up hope for ourselves or our loved ones on account of our frailties.
link7 comments|post comment

Jonathan Edwards' Theology [Aug. 17th, 2008|01:13 pm]

prester_scott
[Tags|]

Interesting article, not just about Edwards, but also Luther, Aquinas, and Paul, and whether their views on justification et al. are "Protestant" or "Catholic."
link1 comment|post comment

Hello from gencon. You should be here. [Aug. 17th, 2008|01:03 am]

voltbang
It's been a good convention this year. The subway downstairs has been slammed to the point that half the times I have gone near there, they have run out of bread and had to close. Cookies are just a distant memory, because they have to choose between bread and cookies in the oven. The colts are opening their new stadium two blocks away, so there were 150,000 colts fans in the area, along with out tens of thousands of geeks. Which means the restaurants are packed. Still downtown indy is amazingly capable of handling a busy as hell day, and everything goes along smoothly. Now the colts have a new stadium, I've heard a lot of speculation, will they keep the rca dome for concerts and stuff, or is it getting demolished to completely re-build? A big stadium floor would be useful convention space, but it could be more useful as convention space. We will see. On to the games.

  • Friday-
    • Arkham horror- We just played the base set, which I have played many times. Still a fun game. I learned a few rules details, but nothing spectacular. 8 players, we won. Noisy room. Hard to hear. Gate bursts are needed to prevent a "wait it out till we win" condition, which we hit. I got lucky and ended up with all the gear I would want. I played the scientist girl, started out with a rifle and the luck skill, an elder sign. Got an ally almost right away that gave me +1 lore +1 fight. And it just got better from there.

    • Car wars- Played this last year as well, and came home itching to play more. Still good, but I should know better than to floor it. I was killed stone cold dead on turn 4. Rememer, no shooting at alluntil turn 3. It was tragic, mines ripped my wheels up, wrecked my handling and then I got rammed and blasted through. Oh how sad.

  • Saturday
    Much dealers room time. GOod t-shirts galore. I liked "I'm so goth, I poop bats" but I'm not that goth.

    • Spycraft2.0- another good rpg, even if it was mostly combat oriented. We were cops sent out to take down a drug shipping house. It was a trap, duh, that we evaded and had to try to run away from, in a part of town that is way out of cop control. So we ended up running from the gangs and shooting for our lives. Escape from NY and Renagades and other movies of that sort. High body count. I was playing a lawman class character, and I made some complaints about being police officers, not assassins, but they fell on deaf ears. And they pointed out that I returned fire with the best of them, not to mention burning down the drug operation, and improvising up some dandy molotov cocktails. I showed them though. As the big climactic gunfight was hitting the big massacre stage, I drew my bade, pulled a massive intimidate check, and arrested the crime lord. THe other players looked at me like I was nuts, but the DM said "roll it", I did, and it wordked. He threw down his gun and surrendered. I had class skills and abilities that combined to really make that one thing my best synergy effect. So that was fun.

    Mayfair games librabry time

    • Horus- Remembered I had played it before while we were setting up. Not surprisingly, I won. Nice game but I'm not excited about it. Tile laying, claiming territory.

    • Something with towers in italy- very quick play. Nice little puzzle game, building towers. I won this one as well. Might pick it up for a quickie. Not terribly hard to teach, for a plus.

    • Toledo- Build swords and deliver them to his excellency, the king of spain. We played this one with a nice man from texas. Nice, but slow. It was like teaching George Bush to play a board game. Every time a new term came up "whuts that?" and when you explained, he would repeat the words you just said, and then ask a question indicating he didn't understand whut he had just repeated.
      "Deal each player five cards"
      "dee-ul each player, faave curds. Ok. Raht. So how many cards dew each of us get?"
      Sadly, he still won. I feel humilated. That said, I loved this game. Loved it to pieces. It has a very interesting flow and I want to figure it out. I screwed up the initial tile placement part of the game, and had to struggle for resources the whole game, while texas dropped two cards right in sweet spots, and never had to draw cards the whole game, as we were all forced to pay him, over and over.



So, for the convention, my favorite new games have been, toledo, galactic overlord, and sen-so combat. I purchased muahhahah after watching a demo, but I haven't played it to give my opinion on it. Also I have dust tomorrow to try out. There were a few games that didn't live up to expecations, but it's been a good 3+ days of gaming so far.
link2 comments|post comment

Review: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor [Aug. 16th, 2008|09:35 pm]

prester_scott
[Tags|]

One sentence: I should have skipped Indy 4 and just seen this.

I'm losing my love for Aloma Cinema Grill though. Food's too expensive for a joint with so many alternatives next door. We could have gotten too full to move at Mellow Mushroom for the same price. Or gotten a big bucket o' chicken and 2-liters of soda at Publix for much less.
linkpost comment

Space Solar Power: "Beam me down, Scotty!" [Aug. 16th, 2008|03:24 pm]

level_head
[Tags|, , ]

Space Solar Power is where our electricity will come from by the end of this century, I strongly believe.

We can wait 90 years to do this. Or we can do it in the next ten. Each of those approaches is expensive in its own way. But consider if humankind had an effectively unlimited supply of electric power.

Fossil fuel usage would be trivial -- in fact, one problem would be declining CO2 in the atmosphere, which currently boosts plant growth by about 15% over a hundred years ago.

The endless misery of the African continent can be ended -- and the deaths of millions from pollution ended. The rainforests would no longer be needed for fuel, which is a major problem in Africa because we won't let them use fossil fuels.

The Middle East will no longer be fueling terrorism with petrodollars.

So what's the problem? First, cost. However, these sorts of costs are now being bandied about by Al Gore and T. Boone Pickens (unlikely business partners) as part of a very unworkable alternative energy scheme. Why not do it right and be done? (And I'll later discuss how to drop the launch cost by a factor of 1000 to 1.)

So -- the large remaining obstacle is public perception: the power will be beamed from space to Earth in microwaves, into antennae the size of airports. One can power a fair sized city: LA needs about three such receivers out in the California desert.

But microwaves! Radiation! Beams from outer space! Gigawatts of electricity in those beams! As one commenter put it, I don't think I'd want to stand in that sort of beam.

The perception is a bit misleading, though. At peak, in the center of the receiver area, the beam strength is about 1/5th to 1/4th that of sunlight at the Earth's surface.

At the fenceline around the receiving antenna (rectenna) the exposure would be about one tenth of the recommended limits for long-term exposure. In the center, they'd be about twice that. (i.e. 23 milliwatts per square centimeter versus 10.)

But that rectenna is not a solid surface, it's a net or mesh connecting elements together strung on poles. It interrupts only a small percentage of the sunlight, making the area underneath the net good for farming.

This would be especially true in desert areas where the full sunlight's a bit harsh anyway.

Here's a NASA document from 1980 with details.

===|==============/ Level Head
link31 comments|post comment

weirder than the aylmer! [Aug. 16th, 2008|12:47 am]

lisamaria
About that waiter guy.

So, when i lived in bloomfield, across 2 streets was a restaurant called Pat Thai. It was good, but not a real good eat-in restaurant. although one time we ate in and the people who worked there were really nice and made us fried ice cream from scratch because they were out. Anyway, this was back when the monkeys lived downstairs.

Last year, they closed down and moved. I forgot where they moved. Turns out, its down the street from where we live now. So we went out to eat.

Strawman got the pad thai with Tofu. There was no tofu in it. It also tasted like it had marmalade in it. The waiter was really nice, but kind of weird. Like, he was telling us all about how much water he drank "his first time" that he visited the restaurant, way before he worked there. "I can't believe I've actually worked here for 10 and a half months!!" Mind you, before you go thinking that it was a cultural thing, the waiters were 20-something caucasian guys. Then, he was being really loud doing a card trick for some kid. We ate our food, he refilled my water (which i appreciate.) to the point where I was actually feeling ill from drinking too much water. Anyway, straw intentionally saved half of his for lunch the next day. it wasn't a giant portion, he could have easily eaten the whole thing. Anyway, we asked for it wrapped and the check and here's where it gets weird.

The waiter takes our check.

We wait.

I ask, eventually "Do you have our to-go bag?"

The waiter looks at me like i have a giant penis growing out of my face.

"Uh, I'm sorry. the man at that table over there also ordered pad thai so I gave it to him. I'm sorry about that."

Then I was like "Ok...", waiting for more.

"I'm really sorry guys. Enjoy the rest of your evening."

Then I told him that dave should have eaten the whole thing since he was saving it for a reason.

The guy said nothing.

We left.

I got pissed, and went back in.

"Hey, is there anything you can DO for me here? we paid for a full meal and i know mistakes happen, and i understand, but could ya DO something for us here?"

He pulls out his wallet like i stuck a gun in his face. "Sure, sure. Take it. its all i have!" and he hands me 3 crumpled bills.

"I don't want your MONEY, i WANT some pad thai. You gave some other person my dinner, the obvious thing is not to hand me your wallet, the obvious thing is just to replace the food."

"Yeah, ok, yeah, Don't worry, I'll pay for it. what kind of meat was in it?"

"Tofu was supposed to be in it, although there was none."

Then he told the woman in the back that he'd pay for it. then he told me to go sit down and enjoy a "steppin' out." That was weird. Steppin out i think is fairly local, but its basically a free rock-n-rollish local band magazine thing. Um, ok. So i sit down and don't see steppin out, but i see "Automobile" magazine, a bunch of games like "connect four," and "The tao of a loving couple" or something like that, which basically has old asian artwork of sex, and chapters like "the tao of birth control" and "proper withdrawal."

Then he came with my food and apologized some more. I told him i didn't think eh should have to pay for it. He said it was ok because he borrowed stuff from the restaurant before. Um.
link11 comments|post comment

[Aug. 16th, 2008|12:30 am]

lisamaria
So... I had today off. I pretty much only work one half day out of friday saturday and sunday- I work million hour days otherwise. Anyway, today I got a lot done. I:

-got a new computer for $300 because my cable company sent me a $300 gift card.
- let the ferrets out in the AM and it confused them
-got a text message about bigfoot.
-saw "Mirrors" which was stupid.
-went out to eat.
-went batshit on waiter where i went out to eat.
-played with the cats
-got a new library card and season 1 of smallville.
-got release for the first time in ages.
link2 comments|post comment

[Aug. 16th, 2008|12:16 am]

lisamaria
Woo hoo.

Thank you Optimum online, now i have a laptop that is actually a laptop again, for cheap. New computer for $300, plus i get a fifty dollar rebate.
link9 comments|post comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]